Lloyd Glasspool vs Jeremy Efferding Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L L L W L
Form
W W L W W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Glasspool 1 - 0 Efferding
They have played 3 sets in total, with Glasspool winning 2 and Efferding winning 1. The last match between Glasspool and Efferding was at the Lexington Challenger, 23-07-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Lloyd Glasspool getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lloyd Glasspool | 1 |
| Jeremy Efferding | 0 |
Lexington Challenger(23-07-2016)
4
6
6
4
7
5
| Glasspool | Stats | Efferding |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 282 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 31 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (194-134) | Career Total W/L | 60% (49-32) |
| $19,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Jeremy Efferding
49%
(
45 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:16:13 | Average Match Time | 2:16:13 |
| 49% (45/92) | 1st Serve % | 54% (45/83) |
| 89% (40/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (38/45) |
| 55% (26/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (18/38) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 33% (27/83) | Return Points Win % | 28% (26/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lloyd Glasspool Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-4 10-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Lloyd Glasspool
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Cannon Kingsley
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
14
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Efferding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Jeremy Efferding
49%
(
45 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Smith
Player
Jeremy Efferding
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Efferding
Player
Robert Galloway
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Pasha
Player
Jeremy Efferding
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Dominguez Alonso
Player
Jeremy Efferding
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
47
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 7-6(4) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (194/134) | Win/Loss | 60% (49/32) |
| 58% (431/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (108/73) |
| 53% (3783/3403) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (902/733) |
| 64% (115/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (30/17) |
| 71% (17/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (19/15) |
| 53% (48/42) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (14/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1975 | Aces Total | 60 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 842 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
| 1:12:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 620.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.84 |
| 64% (12235/19143) | 1st Serve % | 66% (902/1370) |
| 73% (8963/12235) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (597/902) |
| 50% (3474/6908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (242/468) |
| 41% (648/1574) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (44/122) |
| 37% (6925/18848) | Return Points Win % | 36% (501/1383) |
| 25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (66/65) | Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 66% (127/64) | Futures W/L | 62% (48/29) |
| 60% (193/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (49/79) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (59/112) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (11/18) |
| 54% (50/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 85% (193/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (52/46) |
| 15% (193/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (52/6) |
| 23% (135/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (29/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
